Syllables may be broken up into onset, nucleus, and coda.
The nucleus is the vowellike part. Every syllable has a nucleus. Onsets and codas are optional:
|
Rhyme
|
|
||||
Onset
|
Nucleus
|
Coda
|
Note
|
Spelling
|
||
k
|
æ
|
n
|
all
|
Can
|
||
s
|
i
|
|
No coda
|
see
|
||
|
i
|
t
|
No onset
|
Eat
|
||
spr
|
aj
|
t
|
All
|
Sprite
|
||
skr
|
æ
|
t∫
|
All
|
scratch
|
||
spr
|
i
|
|
No coda
|
spree
|
||
|
æ
|
nts
|
No onset
|
ants
|
||
The nucleus and coda, as shown, are often spoken of as a unit called the rhyme.
Given this picture, syllabification is not trivial. Which syllabification is correct for extreme?
| ||
Table of consonant place :
Here are the features :
Bilabial
|
p b m n w
|
Labiodental
|
f v
|
Interdental
|
ð th
|
Alveolar
|
t d s z
|
alveopalatal
|
∫ zh t∫ dzh
|
Palatal
|
j
|
velar
|
k
g ng w
|
glottal
|
h ?
|
Note : Manners are themselves divided up into two major classes:
Obstruents and sonorants. The obstruents are the stops, the fricatives, and
the affricates. The sonorants are the vowels, liquids, glides, and nasals.
Attention: The following table only shows consonants so it does not include
ALL the sonorants
|
Table of consonant manners
Obstruents
|
Stops
|
p b t d k g ?
|
Fricatives
|
f v th ð s z ∫ zh
|
|
Affricates
|
t∫ dzh
|
|
Sonorants
|
Nasals
|
m n ng
|
Liquids
|
r l
|
|
Glides
|
j w
|
Voicing: All English sonorants are voiced, except that [w] may be
voiceless. Obstruents come in voiced/voiceless pairs except for [h] and [?].
Voiceless
|
p
|
t
|
k
|
f
|
th
|
∫
|
t∫
|
h
|
?
|
Voiced
|
b
|
d
|
g
|
v
|
ð
|
zh
|
dzh
|
Here are the features :
Voice
|
All sonorants are voiced in English except that in some dialects
there is a voiceless [w] (transcribed as an upside down [w]). All obstruents
come in voiced/voiceless pairs except for [h] and [?] which are
|
Sonorant
|
All vowels, glides, liquids, and nasals are +Sonorant. All
obstruents are -Sonorant.
|
Consonantal
|
All vowels are -Consonantal. However contrary to your
intuitions, glides and glottals are also -Consonantal. The rest of the
consonants are +Consonantal.
|
Syllabic
|
The intuition of +Syllabic is that the sound can occur as
syllable nucleus. Vowels are always +Syllabic. Liquids and nasal CAN be
either + or - Syllabic. When they are syllable nuclei (huddle, button) they
are +Syllabic.
|
Continuant
|
The primary function of this feature is to distinguish
fricatives, +Continuant, from other obstruents (stops and affricates),
-Continuant. All sonorants except for nasals are -Continuant (and don't worry
about nasals).
|
Attention: The feature +/- consonantal does not
QUITE mean what you think
Classifying obstruents (in the following, to avoid clutter, we ignore affricates)
Classifying obstruents (in the following, to avoid clutter, we ignore affricates)
[-sonorant]
|
||
[-voice]
|
[+voice]
|
|
p t k
|
b d g
|
[-continuant]
|
f s ∫
|
v z zh
|
[+continuant]
|
Some natural classes
-sonorant
|
-sonorant
-continuant |
-sonorant
-continuant -voice |
||
p t k
b d g ? f s ∫ v z zh |
p t k
b d g ? |
p t k
|
||
Obstruents
|
|
Voiceless
Stops |
Another example:
-sonorant
|
-sonorant
+continuant |
-sonorant
+continuant -voice |
p t k
b d g ? f s ∫ v z zh |
f s ∫
v z zh |
f s ∫
|
Obstruents
|
Fricatives
|
Voiceless
Fricatives |
In general the feature system is set up so as to make the specification of
NATURAL sound classes easy. There are place features (which we are not
studying) which make the selection of all the sounds at one place of
articulation easy. For example, selecting EXACTLY the set of sounds k,ng, g
could be done with the following specification (which uses the place of
articulation feature Dorsal):
- Continuant
º Dorsal
Pretty easy.
Restricting this further to k,g, also easy:
- Sonorant
- Continuant
º Dorsal
Some sound classes are NOT natural. For example restricting the first set
to the set k, ng (excluding g) would be very hard.
- Voice + Voice
- Sonorant + Sonorant
- Continuant OR -
Continuant
º Dorsal º Dorsal
All languages
except sign languages use sequences of phones to make words.
No languages allow sounds to combine freely. That is, there are always
constraints on what phones any particular phone can precede and follow. These
constraints are called phonotactic constraints. Syntactic constraints
are constraints on the arrangements of words. Phonotactic constraints are
constraints on the arrangements of phones.
What kind of constraints are the following?
The English morpheme re must always precede the stem it
is attached to. It can never follow the stem.
profane + ity + s = profanities
* profane + s + ity = profanesity
|
Zeroing on phonetics :
1. In any syllable-internal sequence of a nasal and a stop, the nasal
and the stop must have the same place of articulation:
Actual
|
Impossible
|
Possible
|
hand
|
*hamd
|
hant
|
taunt
|
*taumt
|
Taund
|
punk
|
*pumk
|
pung
|
2. In any 2-consonant onset, the second consonant must be a sonorant.
Actual
|
Impossible
|
please
|
*ptease
|
proud
|
*psoud
|
pure[pjur]
|
*pshure
|
twin
|
*tdin
|
trust
|
*tpust
|
queen
|
*ksean
|
clean
|
*cshean
|
cream
|
*cteam
|
3. In any 3-consonant
cluster in an onset, the first consonant must be [s]: splash, strong, spew [s p
j u], extreme [∈ k 's t r ij m].
4.In any 3-consonant cluster in
an onset, the second consonant must be a voiceless stop [p,t,k]: splash,
strong, spew [s p j u], extreme [∈ k 's t r ij m]. Thus although we have
smooth [s m u th] and museum [m j u z i uh m], we have no words beginning [s m
j u...]
Phonotactic constraints are highly
language-particular. Japanese has NO onset clusters. It basically has
Consonant-Vowel syllables(although it allows nasals as codas). So all of the
complex onsets described above are forbidden. This is very common. We call such
a language a CV language.
On the other hand we
have Polish:
co
|
[t s o]
|
what
|
kto
|
[k t o]
|
who
|
ptak
|
[p t a k]
|
bird
|
przez
|
[p ∫ ∈ s
]
|
by/through
|
ksiazka
|
[k ∫ o n ∫ k a]
|
book
|
zgniecic
|
[z g n j ∈
t∫ i t∫]
|
crush
|
grzmot
|
[g zh m ao t]
|
thunderbolt
|
Phonology
Predictability |
Phonology
is the study of the sound patterns of a language. Phonotactics is
part of phonology.
Another
part is the study of predictable sound changes.
We now
discuss predictable phonological changes
In most
cases phones are not predictable. The fact the d is the first sound
in the English word for dog is not predictable.
But
sometimes the occurrence of some phones is quite predictable. The ability to
master these predictable patterns is part of a native speaker's mastery of a
language (and the failure to master them part of what gives non-native
speakers an accent).
Thus it is
part of what a linguist calls the grammar of the language. More on
this the grammar section below.
|
Insertion
Epenthesis |
There
are times when sounds are inserted in a language in order to enforce
phonotactic constraints.
Consider
problem 15, p. 107.
|
conclusion
This kind of process, in which one
sound is inserted in a predictable way, is called epenthesis. Thus
the inserted glides in Tamil are epenthetic glides.
For many dialects of English there
are epenthetic glides as well. Consider the transcriptions of the following
words:
- boat:
[b ow t]
- bait:
[b ej t]
- hold:
[h ow l d]
- hate:
[h ej t]
- post:
[p ow s t]
- pale,
pail: [p ej l]
Generalization:
We seem to see no occurences of plain [o] or plain [e]. [o] and [e] are always
followed by a glide.
The glide is predictable. It is part
of a pattern in English.
We do not want to list it in the
dictionary pronunciation for each word. We want a rule to take
care of this.
Rule: Insert a [w] after [o] and a
[j] after [e]
∅ -> w / o
_
∅ -> j / e
_
Rules & Grammar
grammar is a formal specification of what a native
speaker of a language knows. Part of a job of a grammar is to capture the
predictable patterns. The other part is to capture what's unpredictable.
Thus, a
grammar consists of two basic components:
1. Lexicon: A dictionary consisting of
basic forms (words/morphemes)
2. 2. Rules
1. Tactical rules:
Phonotactics/morphotactics/syntax
2. Redundancy rules: Rules adding
features which are completely predictable
The basic idea (due to a linguist named Leonard
Bloomfield): The lexicon should not contain any information predictable by
general rule. It contains no information about how to combine forms because
that is predictable. Nor does it contain any information about predictable
sounds or sound features.
The glide epenthesis rules for Tamil and English were
redundancy rules. They added predictable features, namely glides, to words.
Such features are said to be derived, because they are inferred or
proven by general principles about the language.
Thus such features are NOT found in the lexicon.
English Vowel Length
Another predictable feature of English words is vowel
length.
Consider Table 3.32, p. 91. It shows that English
vowels are lengthened before certain sounds.
What is the pattern distinguishing Column A from
Column B?
A
|
B
|
||
|
Bat [b æ t]
|
||
Abe [e:j b]
|
Ape [e j p]
|
||
Phase [f e:
j z]
|
Face [f e j s]
|
||
Leave [l i:
j v ]
|
Leaf [l i j f]
|
||
Tag [t æ: g]
|
Tack [t æ k]
|
||
Brogue [b r
o: w g]
|
Broke [b r o w k]
|
||
Tame [t e j m]
|
|||
Meal [m i j
l]
|
|||
Soar [s o w
r]
|
|||
Show [∫ o w]
|
Minimal Pairs
|
Vowel length is not predictable in every
language
The pairs of words in
these tables such as tuli and tu:li in Finnish are called minimal pairs. They are minimal
in that they differ in the minimal way, one sound. The fact that two forms
differ in one sound and mean different things in a language shows that the
sound can make meaningful distinctions in that language. We say the sounds are distinctive.
Vowel length is distinctive in Finnish and
Japanese.
Vowel
length is NOT distinctive in English. Therefore there exist NO pairs of words
like [t u l i] and [t u: l i] in English, words which mean different things and
differ ONLY in the length of a particular vowel.
Distinctiveness versus Predictability
|
The following principle is the most important concept of the chapter
Note : Distinctiveness and predictability are mutually exclusive.
|
If something is
phonetically predictable like English vowel length, then it cannot function to
make meaningful distinctions. It appears only in the company of something else
that is really making the meaningful distinction.
Notice
that you canNOT have minimal pairs with English vowel length: Long vowels show
up only preceding voiced obstruents. So any word with a lengthened vowel will
have at least TWO differences from a word without one: the vowel length and the
voicing of the final obstruent.
bat
|
[b æ t]
|
bad
|
[b æ: d]
|
But then it's the voicing that's doing the work of making a
meaningful contrast. The vowel length is just a predictable consequence of the
voicing distinction!
Phonemes Allophones
We call the phones listed in the lexicon phonemes. We write
these forms in slashes: /æ/.
/æ/ is a listed in the dictionary. It is consequence
of the rule we just formulated that it can sometimes be realized as [æ:]. When
that happens is completely predictable.
It is also a consequence of the rule that [æ] can
sometimes be realized just as plain old [æ]. This is also completely
predictable (/æ/ is realized as [æ] whenever /æ/ is not followed by a voiced
obstruent in the same syllable).
|
No comments:
Post a Comment